[HTML][HTML] Hesitancy about COVID-19 vaccination among pregnant women: A cross-sectional study based on the health belief model
M Firouzbakht, H Sharif Nia, F Kazeminavaei… - BMC Pregnancy and …, 2022 - Springer
M Firouzbakht, H Sharif Nia, F Kazeminavaei, P Rashidian
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2022•SpringerBackground Pregnant women are at high risk for affliction by coronavirus disease 2019
(COVID-19). Vaccination is a main strategy to prevent and manage the COVID-19 pandemic.
However, hesitancy about COVID-19 vaccination (HACV) is a major public health threat and
a major barrier to herd immunity. The aim of the study was to evaluate pregnant women's
HACV based on the Health Belief Model (HBM). Methods This cross-sectional study was
conducted in 2021–2022. Participants were 352 pregnant women selected from several …
(COVID-19). Vaccination is a main strategy to prevent and manage the COVID-19 pandemic.
However, hesitancy about COVID-19 vaccination (HACV) is a major public health threat and
a major barrier to herd immunity. The aim of the study was to evaluate pregnant women's
HACV based on the Health Belief Model (HBM). Methods This cross-sectional study was
conducted in 2021–2022. Participants were 352 pregnant women selected from several …
Background
Pregnant women are at high risk for affliction by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Vaccination is a main strategy to prevent and manage the COVID-19 pandemic. However, hesitancy about COVID-19 vaccination (HACV) is a major public health threat and a major barrier to herd immunity. The aim of the study was to evaluate pregnant women’s HACV based on the Health Belief Model (HBM).
Methods
This cross-sectional study was conducted in 2021–2022. Participants were 352 pregnant women selected from several healthcare centers in the north of Iran. Instruments for data collection were a demographic questionnaire, a COVID-19 Knowledge Questionnaire, a COVID-19 Health Belief Questionnaire, and a question about HACV. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the effects of the study variables on HACV.
Results
The rate of HACV was 42.61%. In the regression model, the three factors of perceived benefits (aOR: 0.700; 95% CI: 0.594 to 0.825), cues to action (aOR: 0.621; 95% CI: 0.516 to 0.574), and history of reproductive problems (aOR: 2.327; 95% CI: 0.1.262 to 4.292) had significant effects on HACV (P < 0.001).
Conclusion
HACV is highly prevalent among pregnant women. The perceived benefits and cues to action components of HBM have significant effects on pregnant women’s HACV, while the perceived threat component has no significant effect on it. HBM is a good model to explain HACV among pregnant women. Educational interventions are necessary to improve pregnant women’s awareness of the risks of COVID-19 for them and their fetus.
Springer